• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

Alston & Bird Tax Blog

  • Home
  • Services
  • Contacts

When Do a Foreign Fund’s Lending & Underwriting Activities Constitute a U.S. Trade or Business?

January 20, 2015 By Heather Ripley

In Chief Counsel Advice 201501013, the IRS determined that a foreign fund was engaged in a U.S. trade or business (“ETBUS”) based on lending and underwriting activities conducted on the fund’s behalf by a U.S. resident fund manager under a management agreement. The IRS attributed the manager’s activities to the fund, for purposes of the ETBUS analysis, finding the activities to be “considerable, continuous, and regular.” The CCA further concluded that the foreign fund’s activities did not qualify for the “trading safe harbors” under Section 864, exploring the fine distinction between “traders” and “dealers.” Because the fund was organized in a non-treaty jurisdiction, the IRS’ determination that the fund was ETBUS meant that the fund was subject to U.S. income tax on income effectively connected with its U.S. lending and underwriting business.

Whether a foreign person is ETBUS (especially those in jurisdictions with which the United States does not have an income tax treaty) is the linchpin for subjecting foreign persons to regular U.S. income taxation at graduated rates. Unfortunately, there is relatively little guidance on when a foreign person’s U.S. activities rise to the level of ETBUS, despite the significant tax consequences that can result. Foreign taxpayers engaged lending or stock or securities transactions, and whose status as ETBUS is unclear, should consult with professional advisers to ascertain their U.S. tax exposure.

See our January 2015 International Tax Advisory for more in-depth discussion of CCA 201501013.

Filed Under: International - Inbound, International Tax Advisory Tagged With: dealer, engaged in a US trade or business, ETBUS, fund, independent agent, IRS, lending, section 864, stock distribution, trader, trading safe harbor, underwriting

About Heather Ripley

Heather Ripley is an associate in the firm’s Federal & International Tax Group. Her practice focuses on federal and international tax services for a range of clients, including domestic and international business entities and individuals.

[Read Bio]

Primary Sidebar

As a service of Alston & Bird’s Tax groups, this blog focuses on current issues and events in international, federal, state and local tax and wealth planning of interest to business.

Subscribe

Receive email notifications when new posts are added.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Tags

401(k) ACA Affordable Care Act audit BEAT CARES Act CFC Corporate Tax Planning covid-19 Delaware ERISA Escheat FATCA FDII Gift cards GILTI international tax IRA IRAs IRS Kelmar New York nexus OECD qualified plans Quill RUUPA SCOTUS Section 351 Section 355 Section 367 Section 385 section 482 section 965 State legislation Subpart F Supreme Court Tax Court Tax Cuts and Jobs Act tax reform TCJA Treasury Unclaimed property UP Wayfair

Secondary Sidebar

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Litigate, Legislate and Repeat: The Delaware Escheat Law Spin Cycle
  • Looking Back at Georgia’s 2022 Legislative Session
  • Diving into IRS’s Annual Report on Advance Pricing Agreements: Can APMA Overcome Its Sisyphean Task?
  • California Dreaming of a Voluntary Compliance Program
  • Testing for COVID and Your Kits for Free: Expanded Coverage of OTC COVID-19 Test Kits and Developments in Preventive Care

Archives

Copyright © 2022 · Alston & Bird · All Rights Reserved. Privacy.