• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

Alston & Bird Tax Blog

  • Home
  • Services
  • Contacts

international tax

What’s in a Name? Final FTC Regulations Rebrand the Jurisdictional Nexus Requirement

January 18, 2022 By Edward Tanenbaum and Stefanie Kavanagh

Our International Tax Group delves into the attribution requirement (née jurisdictional nexus requirement) of the final foreign tax credit regulations and finds that taxpayers will still face uncertainties in the application of the foreign tax credit. The IRS seeks to modernize regulations to mitigate double taxation of foreign-source income Many of the final regulations follow the proposed regulations, but some were modified based on comments from taxpayers Gray areas remain, including how reasonably similar a foreign rule must be Read the full advisory here. [...]Read more

Filed Under: International Tax Advisory Tagged With: attribution requirement, FTC, international tax, jurisdictional nexus requirement, OECD, Pillar One, regulations, Tax

Partnership Abuse of Entity Rule Invoked in Section 367(d) Outbound IP Transaction

May 15, 2019 By Edward Tanenbaum, Jasper L. (Jack) Cummings, Jr. and Daniel Reach

Our International Tax Group explores a recent, heavily redacted Chief Counsel Advice applying the partnership abuse of entity rule to a Section 367(d) outbound IP transaction. Outbound IP transfers and Section 367(d) The partnership abuse of entity rule Interaction between the partnership abuse of entity rule and Section 367(d) successor rules Read the full advisory here. [...]Read more

Filed Under: International - Outbound, Partnerships Tagged With: international tax, Section 367

Tax Reform: Invitation to the Weekly Client Update from Alston & Bird

January 8, 2018 By Alston & Bird Tax Team

With tax reform officially upon us, our subject matter experts will take a deeper dive into areas that are critical to your business, such as corporate taxes, international issues, executive compensation and employee benefits, and partnerships.   The 2018 call-in series will kick off on Tuesday, January 9. All seminars will start at 11am ET and last approximately 30 minutes. Click here to RSVP and receive the dial-in information.   [...]Read more

Filed Under: Corporate - Federal, Corporate - State, Employee Benefits, Federal - Corporate Tax Planning, Federal Tax, Partnerships, Tax Policy, Tax Reform Tagged With: corporate, employee benefits, executive compensation, health & welfare, international tax, partnerships, section 965, Tax, tax reform

International Tax ADVISORY: Impact of the Multilateral Instrument of U.S. Taxpayers

July 14, 2017 By Edward Tanenbaum and Stefanie Kavanagh

Nearly 70 countries have signed the OECD’s multilateral instrument – but the U.S. isn’t one of them. Our International Tax Group takes stock of how the MLI will prevent base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) and what it all means for U.S. companies. What is the multilateral instrument? Why didn’t the U.S. sign it? How will it impact U.S. multinationals? Read the complete advisory here. [...]Read more

Filed Under: International Tax Advisory Tagged With: Action 14 initiative, Action 15, base erosion and profit shifting, BEPS, cross border tax disputes, Department of State, Department of Treasury, international tax, limitations on benefits, mandatory binding arbitration, MLI, model tax treaty provision, multilateral instrument, OECD, PPT, principal purpose test, Senate, Treasury Department

Killing the Killer B: The Treasury and IRS Issue a Sixth Set of Rules on Killer B Transactions

December 15, 2016 By Jasper L. (Jack) Cummings, Jr. and Stefanie Kavanagh

The Treasury looks to slay Killer B transactions with its newest rules. Our International Tax Group follows the trail of glitches in the regulation.

Read the full advisory here.

Filed Under: International Tax Advisory Tagged With: Acquiring A, Advisory, CFC, E&P, Earnings and Profits, foreign corporation, international tax, IRS, Issuer A, Killer B, Notice 2014-32, Notice 2016-73, REg 1.367(b)-10, Section 301, Section 367, Section 956, stock-for-stock B, Treasury

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

As a service of Alston & Bird’s Tax groups, this blog focuses on current issues and events in international, federal, state and local tax and wealth planning of interest to business.

Subscribe

Receive email notifications when new posts are added.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Tags

401(k) ACA Affordable Care Act audit BEAT CARES Act CFC Corporate Tax Planning covid-19 Delaware ERISA Escheat FATCA FBAR FDII Gift cards GILTI international tax IRA IRS Kelmar New York nexus OECD qualified plans Quill RUUPA SCOTUS Section 351 Section 355 Section 367 Section 385 section 482 section 965 State legislation Subpart F Supreme Court Tax Court Tax Cuts and Jobs Act tax reform TCJA Treasury Unclaimed property UP Wayfair

Secondary Sidebar

Categories

Recent Posts

  • PTET Elections: Don’t Let Them “Pass” By Unnoticed in M&A Transactions
  • Post-Roe Issues for Health Plan Sponsors: Navigating the Rapidly Changing Legal Landscape
  • Litigate, Legislate and Repeat: The Delaware Escheat Law Spin Cycle
  • Looking Back at Georgia’s 2022 Legislative Session
  • Diving into IRS’s Annual Report on Advance Pricing Agreements: Can APMA Overcome Its Sisyphean Task?

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Alston & Bird · All Rights Reserved. Privacy.