• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

Alston & Bird Tax Blog

  • Home
  • Services
  • Contacts

economic substance doctrine

“Nobody Loses All The Time”: Remembering Negative Precedents

March 6, 2015 By Jasper L. (Jack) Cummings, Jr.

The IRS can have a long memory when it comes to rulings and decisions against taxpayers. Even with the seemingly all-purpose economic substance doctrine in its utility belt, the IRS sometimes dusts off old precedents to attack transactions. Revenue Ruling 80-239, 1980-2 C.B. 103, and Basic, Inc. v. United States, 549 F.2d 740 (Ct. Cl. 1977) are two anti-taxpayer authorities that targeted perceived abuses that are now largely obsolete. Nevertheless, the IRS may still invoke these precedents for support in totally different situations. Taxpayers should be aware of how the IRS might use [...]Read more

Filed Under: Controversies - Federal, Corporate - Federal, Federal - Corporate Tax Planning, Federal Tax Advisory Tagged With: Basic Inc. v. United States, Corporate Tax Planning, economic substance doctrine, IRS, precedent, Rev. Rul. 80-239

Federal Tax ADVISORY: Supreme Court May Consider Economic Substance Doctrine

May 1, 2014 By Alston & Bird Tax Team

This advisory discusses how several taxpayers have petitioned or are considering petitioning the Supreme Court of the United States to review their losses at the hands of lower court judges applying the economic substance doctrine.

This advisory is provided on the Alston & Bird website: www.alston.com/advisories/fed-tax-may-2014/

Filed Under: Controversies - Federal, Federal Tax Advisory Tagged With: economic substance doctrine

Primary Sidebar

As a service of Alston & Bird’s Tax groups, this blog focuses on current issues and events in international, federal, state and local tax and wealth planning of interest to business.

Subscribe

Receive email notifications when new posts are added.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Tags

401(k) ACA Affordable Care Act audit BEAT CARES Act CFC Corporate Tax Planning covid-19 Delaware ERISA Escheat FATCA FBAR FDII Gift cards GILTI international tax IRA IRS Kelmar New York nexus OECD qualified plans Quill RUUPA SCOTUS Section 351 Section 355 Section 367 Section 385 section 482 section 965 State legislation Subpart F Supreme Court Tax Court Tax Cuts and Jobs Act tax reform TCJA Treasury Unclaimed property UP Wayfair

Secondary Sidebar

Categories

Recent Posts

  • PTET Elections: Don’t Let Them “Pass” By Unnoticed in M&A Transactions
  • Post-Roe Issues for Health Plan Sponsors: Navigating the Rapidly Changing Legal Landscape
  • Litigate, Legislate and Repeat: The Delaware Escheat Law Spin Cycle
  • Looking Back at Georgia’s 2022 Legislative Session
  • Diving into IRS’s Annual Report on Advance Pricing Agreements: Can APMA Overcome Its Sisyphean Task?

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Alston & Bird · All Rights Reserved. Privacy.