• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

Alston & Bird Tax Blog

  • Home
  • Services
  • Contacts

Product Sellers into California Market Will Have New Requirements to Disclose their Efforts to Eradicate Slavery and Human Trafficking in Their Global Supply Chain

October 1, 2010 By Jasper L. (Jack) Cummings, Jr. and Edward Tanenbaum

Commencing on January 1, 2012, retail sellers and manufacturers selling goods in the State of California will have new obligations to disclose their efforts to eradicate slavery and human trafficking from their direct supply chains for tangible goods offered for sale. As we indicated in our earlier September 7th blog, there was a high likelihood that the bill SB 657, entitled the “California Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010” might be signed into law by the end of the month. On September 30th, Governor Schwarzenegger signed the bill stating, “I am proud that in California, we have enacted some of the toughest laws to punish human traffickers and protect their victims. This legislation will increase transparency, allow consumers to make better, more informed choices and motivate businesses to ensure humane practices throughout the supply chain.”

Who has a Duty to Comply?

Retail sellers and manufacturers selling goods into California and having annual worldwide gross receipts over $100 million dollars (as defined in California’s Revenue and Tax Code Section 25120) are subject to this law.

The Franchise Tax Board will be responsible for providing a list of all companies required to comply based on tax returns filed after January 1, 2011 to the Attorney General for enforcement purposes.

What are these New Compliance Duties?

Each retailer or manufacturer must disclose through a link on its web homepage that it does the following:

  • Engages in internal verification of product supply chains to evaluate and address risks of human trafficking and slavery (and must specify that this verification was not conducted by a third party)
  • Conducts audits of suppliers to evaluate supplier compliance with company standards for trafficking and slavery in supply chains (and specify if the verification was not an independent, unannounced audit)
  • Requires direct suppliers to certify that materials incorporated into the product comply with the laws regarding slavery and human trafficking in the country or countries in which they are doing business.
  • Maintains internal accountability standards and procedures for employees or contractors failing to meet its standards.
  • Provides training program to employees and management on human trafficking and slavery, and mitigating risks within supply chains of products.

How will these duties be enforced?

The statute states that the exclusive remedy for a violations of this law shall an enforcement action brought by the California Attorney General for injunctive relief.

However, the statute also states that this section does not limit the remedies available for a violation of any other state or federal law, leaving some open questions as to whether for example, the unfair business practices law in Section 17200 et seq would be available to plaintiffs seeking to enforce this law’s disclosure provisions.

Combined with California’s new green chemistry laws, the burden and responsibility for product sellers in California to know, regulate, monitor and report on their entire global supply chain is increasing, whether it’s a toxic ingredient used, the manufacturing process is used, the types of energy and fuels used or now the labor used.

For more information contact Maureen Gorsen in our Sacramento office, 916-498-3305.

Filed Under: State and Local Planning

About Jasper L. (Jack) Cummings, Jr.

Jack Cummings is counsel in the Federal Tax Group of Alston & Bird in Raleigh and Washington, D.C. He served as IRS associate chief counsel (corporate) and chair of the Corporate Tax Committee of the ABA Section of Taxation.

[Read Bio]

About Edward Tanenbaum

Edward Tanenbaum is co-chair of the firm’s Federal & International Tax Group and a member of the firm’s Global Resources & Strategies Committee. Mr. Tanenbaum’s practice consists primarily of planning and structuring tax efficient solutions for cross-border business transactions and investments by foreign multinational corporations and high-net-worth individuals.

[Read Bio]

Primary Sidebar

As a service of Alston & Bird’s Tax groups, this blog focuses on current issues and events in international, federal, state and local tax and wealth planning of interest to business.

Subscribe

Receive email notifications when new posts are added.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Tags

401(k) ACA Affordable Care Act audit BEAT CARES Act CFC Corporate Tax Planning covid-19 Delaware ERISA Escheat FATCA FDII Gift cards GILTI international tax IRA IRAs IRS Kelmar New York nexus OECD qualified plans Quill RUUPA SCOTUS Section 351 Section 355 Section 367 Section 385 section 482 section 965 State legislation Subpart F Supreme Court Tax Court Tax Cuts and Jobs Act tax reform TCJA Treasury Unclaimed property UP Wayfair

Secondary Sidebar

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Borrowers Beware: Short Sales of Distressed Assets May Have Unfavorable Tax Consequences
  • Top Unclaimed Property Regulatory and Enforcement Challenges in 2021
  • If at First You Don’t Succeed, Try, Try Again to Enact the Nation’s First Digital Advertising Services Tax
  • Digital Services Taxes and Nexus for Foreign Tax Credit Purposes
  • FAQs on Unclaimed Property Aspects of Retirement Assets

Archives

Copyright © 2021 · Alston & Bird · All Rights Reserved. Privacy.