• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

Alston & Bird Tax Blog

  • Home
  • Services
  • Contacts

Convertible Preferred Equity Certificates

July 13, 2011 By Jasper L. (Jack) Cummings, Jr. and Edward Tanenbaum

Hybrid instrument advantages in cross-border investment Instruments may be treated as debt for foreign income tax purposes but as equity or U.S. tax purposes. Other instruments exist that may be treated as debt for U.S. tax purposes and as equity for foreign tax purposes. These instruments are often used within a multinational group to achieve cross-border tax arbitrage, to accomplish foreign or U.S. tax base erosion, or to engage in foreign tax credit planning. The ability to use hybrid instruments to engage in foreign tax credit planning was significantly curtailed with the enactment of Code section 909. Pub. L. No. 111-226, sec. 211. Prior to enactment of section 909, certain hybrid instruments treated as debt for foreign tax purposes and as equity for U.S. tax purposes were used to help facilitate certain “foreign tax credit splitter” transactions where creditable foreign taxes were separated from the underlying foreign earnings and profits.

Such instruments may also be used by investors (e.g., investment funds) making cross border investments. One such example is a Convertible Preferred Equity Certificate (“CPEC”). A CPEC is a hybrid financing instrument designed to be regarded as debt of a Luxembourg issuer from a Luxembourg tax perspective, Although the IRS will typically not issue a private letter ruling, it is not uncommon for issuers of CPECs to obtain a ruling from Luxembourg tax authorities confirming the treatment of CPECs as debt, but equity from a U.S. tax perspective. Profit participating loans are another example of a hybrid instrument that may be treated as debt in Luxembourg and certain other foreign jurisdictions while being treated as equity from a U.S. tax perspective.

Typical features of the CPEC include a 49-year term; a fixed annual interest rate computed based on the “arm’s-length” principle, taking into consideration their conversion feature; convertibility into shares of the issuer at a fixed ratio established upon the issuance of the CPECs; an ability to be redeemed at fair market value under certain conditions; transferability by the holder only with the simultaneous transfer of an equivalent portion of the holder’s shares of the issuer; subordination to other debt; and no voting power.

Because CPECs are treated as debt for Luxembourg tax purposes, interest expense may be imputed on CPECs resulting in Luxembourg tax deductions. In addition, interest paid on CPECs is generally exempt from Luxembourg withholding tax. From a U.S. perspective, assuming the holder is treated as owning equity, interest imputed on a CPEC does not result in corresponding imputed interest income in the United States. Holders typically owe U.S. tax on dividend income only when declared and paid. In addition, CPECs are convertible into common shares and under certain circumstances are redeemable. Because conversion or redemption is typically carried out at the fair market value of the shares at the time of the conversion or redemption, holders are able to extract appreciation in the issuer in a tax efficient manner. From a Luxembourg perspective, a conversion is not a dividend subject to withholding, and from a United States holder’s perspective, the exchange may qualify for a preferential rate of tax as qualified dividend income or the sale or exchange of a capital asset. Since CPECs are also treated as equity in certain foreign jurisdictions, CPECs may also be used to facilitate cross-border arbitrage between Luxembourg and other foreign jurisdictions.

Filed Under: Corporate - Federal, International - Outbound

About Jasper L. (Jack) Cummings, Jr.

Jack Cummings is counsel in the Federal Tax Group of Alston & Bird in Raleigh and Washington, D.C. He served as IRS associate chief counsel (corporate) and chair of the Corporate Tax Committee of the ABA Section of Taxation.

[Read Bio]

About Edward Tanenbaum

Edward Tanenbaum is co-chair of the firm’s Federal & International Tax Group and a member of the firm’s Global Resources & Strategies Committee. Mr. Tanenbaum’s practice consists primarily of planning and structuring tax efficient solutions for cross-border business transactions and investments by foreign multinational corporations and high-net-worth individuals.

[Read Bio]

Primary Sidebar

As a service of Alston & Bird’s Tax groups, this blog focuses on current issues and events in international, federal, state and local tax and wealth planning of interest to business.

Subscribe

Receive email notifications when new posts are added.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Tags

401(k) ACA Affordable Care Act audit BEAT CARES Act CFC Corporate Tax Planning covid-19 Delaware ERISA Escheat FATCA FDII Gift cards GILTI international tax IRA IRAs IRS Kelmar New York nexus OECD qualified plans Quill RUUPA SCOTUS Section 351 Section 355 Section 367 Section 385 section 482 section 965 State legislation Subpart F Supreme Court Tax Court Tax Cuts and Jobs Act tax reform TCJA Treasury Unclaimed property UP Wayfair

Secondary Sidebar

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Litigate, Legislate and Repeat: The Delaware Escheat Law Spin Cycle
  • Looking Back at Georgia’s 2022 Legislative Session
  • Diving into IRS’s Annual Report on Advance Pricing Agreements: Can APMA Overcome Its Sisyphean Task?
  • California Dreaming of a Voluntary Compliance Program
  • Testing for COVID and Your Kits for Free: Expanded Coverage of OTC COVID-19 Test Kits and Developments in Preventive Care

Archives

Copyright © 2022 · Alston & Bird · All Rights Reserved. Privacy.