• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

Alston & Bird Tax Blog

  • Home
  • Services
  • Contacts

California Proposes to Create New Corporate Entity for Environmentally/Socially Conscious Companies

September 8, 2011 By Jasper L. (Jack) Cummings, Jr. and Edward Tanenbaum

The two bills have just passed the California Legislature that would allow companies to become a benefit corporation (AB 361) or a flexible purpose corporation (SB 201), fundamentally changing California’s Corporations Code.

Under either law, California would allow a new type of corporation if part of its mission is to improve society and the environment, and the corporation creates a “general public benefit” or “material positive impact on society and the environment.”

According to advocates of the proposed legislation, the new corporate entity is necessary because “the legal issue of fiduciary responsibility has long been used as a barrier by companies who prefer or are deterred from taking proactive social and environmental steps. In many cases, this law regarding fiduciary responsibility has given companies legal cover to avoid substantive action to clean up pollution, adopt greener chemicals or avoid sweatshop sourcing.”

By creating a new legal entity, the advocates hope to allow a company “to include a social and environmental mission that is given equal weight, perhaps even greater weight, than profits.” Recent laws passed by the California Legislature have asked companies doing business in California to take on more environmental and social responsibilities in their global supply chain (see, e.g., anti-slavery) The advocates of the two bills promise that this is just the beginning as many laws and regulations will be needed in order “to transform mainstream business to pursue environmental and social goals as aggressively as they do financial ones.”

Creation of the new legal entity will also set forth a path for preferential treatment under tax, government contracts, and environmental regulation.

Specifically, the bills do not address the tax treatment of benefit corporations or flexible purpose corporations under California law. Thus, if the bills pass, it appears that these new legal entities will initially be treated like other California corporations for tax purposes. It is logical for us to speculate, however, that the California Legislature will gear future tax incentives toward such entities, given the societal and environmental benefits that they are intended to provide. Such incentives could include, for example, corporate income tax credits for creating jobs in California or for relocating a headquarters to the state.

Governor Brown has until October 9th to sign or veto these bills.

Filed Under: Corporate - State, State and Local Tax Incentives Tagged With: AB 361, SB 201

About Jasper L. (Jack) Cummings, Jr.

Jack Cummings is counsel in the Federal Tax Group of Alston & Bird in Raleigh and Washington, D.C. He served as IRS associate chief counsel (corporate) and chair of the Corporate Tax Committee of the ABA Section of Taxation.

[Read Bio]

About Edward Tanenbaum

Edward Tanenbaum is co-chair of the firm’s Federal & International Tax Group and a member of the firm’s Global Resources & Strategies Committee. Mr. Tanenbaum’s practice consists primarily of planning and structuring tax efficient solutions for cross-border business transactions and investments by foreign multinational corporations and high-net-worth individuals.

[Read Bio]

Primary Sidebar

As a service of Alston & Bird’s Tax groups, this blog focuses on current issues and events in international, federal, state and local tax and wealth planning of interest to business.

Subscribe

Receive email notifications when new posts are added.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Tags

401(k) ACA Affordable Care Act audit BEAT CARES Act CFC Corporate Tax Planning covid-19 Delaware ERISA Escheat FATCA FDII Gift cards GILTI international tax IRA IRAs IRS Kelmar New York nexus OECD qualified plans Quill RUUPA SCOTUS Section 351 Section 355 Section 367 Section 385 section 482 section 965 State legislation Subpart F Supreme Court Tax Court Tax Cuts and Jobs Act tax reform TCJA Treasury Unclaimed property UP Wayfair

Secondary Sidebar

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Litigate, Legislate and Repeat: The Delaware Escheat Law Spin Cycle
  • Looking Back at Georgia’s 2022 Legislative Session
  • Diving into IRS’s Annual Report on Advance Pricing Agreements: Can APMA Overcome Its Sisyphean Task?
  • California Dreaming of a Voluntary Compliance Program
  • Testing for COVID and Your Kits for Free: Expanded Coverage of OTC COVID-19 Test Kits and Developments in Preventive Care

Archives

Copyright © 2022 · Alston & Bird · All Rights Reserved. Privacy.